Mine is a MP dual pattern.
I also have a MP forged MP 3.45 crank that is a single pattern 8 bolt.
I also have a MP forged MP 3.45 crank that is a single pattern 8 bolt.
Mine is a MP dual pattern.
I also have a MP forged MP 3.45 crank that is a single pattern 8 bolt.
6 bolt cranks MP cranks made by Scat
did you buy them from Mancini when they were clearing them out a couple years ago? I wish I would have grabbed one! Are you wanting to get rid of one of them?I still got 2 340 main 3.58 stroke cranks in their boxes. from MP ......
I totally understand your statement if stock components are to be used but if you upgrade to forged crankshaft aftermarket rods etc the price becomes a lot closerAny love for a "373"?? Not from me, I'd build the 360 at .040 and have nearly the same thing for a ton less money.
Thats when and where I got mine from. $400 to my door. CAn't beat it with a stick! Couyldn't say NO! to it.did you buy them from Mancini when they were clearing them out a couple years ago? I wish I would have grabbed one! Are you wanting to get rid of one of them?
Using stock components was the whole idea behind this combination in the early 70s when there were not many stroker parts available. These days its cheaper to build a 408 or 416 (with shelf parts) rather than a forged 3.58 stroke 340, which will be pretty much custom everything, more expensive, more machine work, and less cubes in the end.I totally understand your statement if stock components are to be used but if you upgrade to forge crankshaft aftermarket rods etc the price becomes a lot closer
I'm not sure what machine work you're talking about, and I understand how they used to turn down 360 cranks to a 340 main journal size not ideal. The rest is really straightforward bolt up stuff. And I would buy a crankshaft forged, I have no desire to move to a cast crank after running 340 forged especially with a four-speed carUsing stock components was the whole idea behind this combination in the early 70s when there were not many stroker parts available. These days its cheaper to build a 408 or 416 (with shelf parts) rather than a forged 3.58 stroke 340, which will be pretty much custom everything, more expensive, more machine work, and less cubes in the end.
The whole idea your talking about involves the cast 360 crank...the additional cost to turn that down, the pistons have to be machined on the tops and bottoms to clear the crank, ect ect. That's why I say a 360 is nearly as good, and cheaper, the 408 is also cheaper than your 373 recipe.... just one man's opinion.I'm not sure what machine work you're talking about, and I understand how they used to turn down 360 cranks to a 340 main journal size not ideal. The rest is really straightforward bolt up stuff. And I would buy a crankshaft forged, I have no desire to move to a cast crank after running 340 forged especially with a four-speed car
No the whole idea you're talking about involves turning a 360 crank down. What I'm talking about is putting a forged 340 crank that has a 3.58 stroke along with 30 or 40 over 340 at 4.070 4 .080 bore to create a 371_373. turning down crankshafts is obsoleteThe whole idea your talking about involves the cast 360 crank...the additional cost to turn that down, the pistons have to be machined on the tops and bottoms to clear the crank, ect ect. That's why I say a 360 is nearly as good, and cheaper, the 408 is also cheaper than your 373 recipe.... just one man's opinion.
did you buy them from Mancini when they were clearing them out a couple years ago? I wish I would have grabbed one! Are you wanting to get rid of one of them?
Oh ok...your post clearly stated "373" and reference to the, yes, obsolete idea of the 360 crank. I didn't realize you were talking about a 3.58 340 main crank. Carry onNo the whole idea you're talking about involves turning a 360 crank down. What I'm talking about is putting a forged 340 crank that has a 3.58 stroke along with 30 or 40 over 340 at 4.070 4 .080 bore to create a 371_373 turning down crankshaft is obsolete
And right here your talking about EXACTLY what I was addressing.....How do you feel about the old 373 build? Which is the old 340 block with a 360 stroke crankshaft. It's one of my favorites I just love the bore stroke ratio ,piston speed and other dynamics of the combo. It is falling out of Grace with the low cost 4 in strokers what's your opinion?
I can see where you got that from that.And right here your talking about EXACTLY what I was addressing.....
I remember the article reusing the OEM stock parts for the build. That’s all there was back then. I’m not sure there were any stroker kits or just stroker cranks back in the 70’s at all. It was a smart move to look at all the parts and think about how they can be repurposed.Using stock components was the whole idea behind this combination in the early 70s when there were not many stroker parts available. These days its cheaper to build a 408 or 416 (with shelf parts) rather than a forged 3.58 stroke 340, which will be pretty much custom everything, more expensive, more machine work, and less cubes in the end.
funny you mention I am going ovcer a 340,and I am noticing alot of "cheap parts" that weren't around say 10-15 years ago. IMO there were better quality parts around back in the 2000s I suppose there still is good quality but it isnt cheap.Cheap Chinese cranks has fostered a new found love for dump truck like torque curves.
I think the availability of a big bore SBM at a reasonable price would turn that around. If I had realized I would spend over $2k on machine work rebuilding my 360 block I would have built a Ritter block with a big bore, small mains/ rod journals and bought the used mega $$$ NASCAR crank I found for $600...
Yes that article always impressed meAny love for a 373? Yes! I have quite the affinity for this 371 built in 2011. Probably the best bang for the buck IMO of all SBM's at this power level. I did it with a very simple 360 .060" block, 3.58" Eagle crank, Scat 6.123" rods << Doesn't get much simpler or cheaper than that. J.Rob
371ci Mopar Small Block - Popular Hot Rodding Magazine
Yes that article always impressed me