Dartfreak75
Restore it, Dont part it!
That being said I have never had a speeding ticket ever. Ppl say I drive like a grandma. Lol my cousin pulled me over one time (just messing with me) for going to slow Haha.
CHP asks why I was driving 88MPH? I told him I was trying to get back to the future, still got ticket....I got one a few weeks ago, 88 MPH in a 65. about 400.00.
He agrees with it.as well as you have.... you judged the same circumstance with the same info I have. And don't worry about what my God considers, he was brought before the unjust law of his time also
What's your God think about you giving someone the finger in post 13????![]()

No, in Ohio a cop has to have probable cause to make a stop. He lied about probable cause not knowing that I had knowledge that he was wrong.Your perspective is skewed. He was stopped and questioned, not searched. It was perfectly legal and he was not persecuted.
The enforcement of law allows that. There was nothing unfair about it.
Well stated !! And exactly, there was a crime, but it was committed by the enforcer of the law! And no, I'm not against the police, but there are bad in every profession. Doctors, teachers, pastors, etc and..... and the police! I'm ok with calling them out when intentional misconduct is performed!No, in Ohio a cop has to have probable cause to make a stop. He lied about probable cause not knowing that I had knowledge that he was wrong.
If I had been drunk, the case would have been tossed as there was no legal reason to stop me in the first place. My Atty told me that he's gotten and seen a bunch of DUI's reduced to reckless driving or dismissed altogether due to an illegal stop.
I don't like drunks on the road, but what I don't like, even more, is my 4th Amendment rights violated.
My light wasn't out, I knew that, he no reason to suspect that I was drinking, as I wasn't. I wasn't driving erratically or dangerously, he observed me come to a complete stop at a sign, used my signals both on the right turn and the left turn. The only thing I was doing was driving on a rural road at 2:00 am. He didn't smell alcohol on my breath as I wasn't drinking, (actually I have never in my life took the 1st sip) I wasn't slurring my speech, nor was stumbling when I walked to the rear of the car. BTW, he wouldn't have known any of those factors if he hadn't illegally pulled me over.
So, to sum up, you're wrong on this, while not prosecuted, I was certainly persecuted, my rights were violated and when it was reported, nothing was done.
There is no law in Ohio that states that a peace officer can detain any person without probable cause. He didn't have it. If fact he (knowingly) lied about his probable cause. So, the law does not allow for that. There was a crime committed, twice, and I was the victim. there's nothing fair about that at all.
LOL!??? That comment was supposed to get you out of the ticket!??? LOLCHP asks why I was driving 88MPH? I told him I was trying to get back to the future, still got ticket....
Yeah this was my argument at my very first radar ticket when I was a kid. They first started using automatic photo radar here probably about 30 years ago.So you see no problem with a third party( non law enforcement) taking a picture of you speeding, I'll admit, then sending a process server not an Officer of the Law, to give you a ticket. What happened to being able to confront your accuser( the third party camera) in person in a court of law. In fact shortly after word the whole process has been challenged and the photo radar taken down for now. I was challenging the process not so much my guilt or innocence.
In Ohio, most cities that have speed cameras don't own, operate, maintain or collect fines from the cameras. The cities receive a percentage of the fines, a private company receives the rest. The typical line is "its about safety, not revenue." I call B/S.So you see no problem with a third party( non law enforcement) taking a picture of you speeding, I'll admit, then sending a process server not an Officer of the Law, to give you a ticket. What happened to being able to confront your accuser( the third party camera) in person in a court of law. In fact shortly after word the whole process has been challenged and the photo radar taken down for now. I was challenging the process not so much my guilt or innocence.
No, in Ohio a cop has to have probable cause to make a stop. He lied about probable cause not knowing that I had knowledge that he was wrong.
If I had been drunk, the case would have been tossed as there was no legal reason to stop me in the first place. My Atty told me that he's gotten and seen a bunch of DUI's reduced to reckless driving or dismissed altogether due to an illegal stop.
I don't like drunks on the road, but what I don't like, even more, is my 4th Amendment rights violated.
My light wasn't out, I knew that, he no reason to suspect that I was drinking, as I wasn't. I wasn't driving erratically or dangerously, he observed me come to a complete stop at a sign, used my signals both on the right turn and the left turn. The only thing I was doing was driving on a rural road at 2:00 am. He didn't smell alcohol on my breath as I wasn't drinking, (actually I have never in my life took the 1st sip) I wasn't slurring my speech, nor was stumbling when I walked to the rear of the car. BTW, he wouldn't have known any of those factors if he hadn't illegally pulled me over.
So, to sum up, you're wrong on this, while not prosecuted, I was certainly persecuted, my rights were violated and when it was reported, nothing was done.
There is no law in Ohio that states that a peace officer can detain any person without probable cause. He didn't have it. If fact he (knowingly) lied about his probable cause. So, the law does not allow for that. There was a crime committed, twice, and I was the victim. there's nothing fair about that at all.
But he didn’t abuse his power and only detained you for a short while. The barracks treated you respectfully when you called afterward.
They were looking for DUI as well they should. You got caught up in it and were inconvenienced.
Small price to pay to help keep drunks off the road.
It is not “them vs us.” They are “us”.
Nope, sorry. This is not Nazi Germany. In this country when cops contact you THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE a good idea that
a crime was commited..........not just a feeling, a hunch, guesswork, or a wish
and that YOU the guy they are contacting, is involved
NOW SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS!!!!