Please check your inbox.For the driver's side manifold, did you have to use an A-body manifold, or did you use a B or E body 318 manifold? thanks
There are some E and B body 318 manifolds near me for cheap, but wondering if they will work.
Please check your inbox.For the driver's side manifold, did you have to use an A-body manifold, or did you use a B or E body 318 manifold? thanks
There are some E and B body 318 manifolds near me for cheap, but wondering if they will work.
yeah man, that's the juice you need to bring the smoothie together.Woah nice, this is basically exactly what I'm doing!
Thanks for the input, all. I gues I get my springs together before bringing the heads in. Is this the spring kit I should get? Hughes 1199
Hey guys, I had another thread called "What to Do with My Scamp" in which I described how I have a slant- six equipped 71 Scamp with oil pressure problems.
View attachment 1716477104
At the end of that thread, I decided to pick up a 5.9 Magnum to replace the worn slant six.
View attachment 1716477105
In this thread, I want to chronicle my build and ask some questions along the way.
My goals with this build and swap is to do it as cheap as reasonably possible. I also want to have the engine make decent power, but have great street manners. I have done the hot rod thing, I've had a 440 4 speed, multiple cars with lumpy cam and headers, and this time I want to make something that has good torque but is fairly civilize and super reliable.
Actually, what I really want is for this Scamp to be a dependable, comfortable daily driver.
I'd like:
- Around 300 hp
- Air conditioning
- Power steering
- Cast iron manifolds! Yes, that's right.
- Hoping to reuse my rotating assembly (crank, cam, piston, rods, roller lifters)
Right now my spend is:
$375 for the motor.
Tonight I started tearing it apart. It looks a little sludgey in there, more than I was expecting. Hopefully the bores look okay. The motor had 101k miles, according to the junkyard.
View attachment 1716477106
As I start pricing out all the needed parts, I am really shocked to find that the motor itself is pretty much going to be the cheapest part of the build! Crazy that an aluminum intake is now $500. Last time I did this, they were $300.
also, are you thinking you want it to be a cruiser? something to get out on the freeway with? if so, you might want to consider a 998 trans (beefy 904). some of the nice things with that are the lower power loss compared to a 727, the 2.74/1.54 first/second gear vs. 2.45/1.45, and you can get them with mechanical/hydraulic lockup (M body) or electric/solenoid driven lockup (IIRC, EFI trucks 87-up). lockup gives you the opportunity to use a higher stall/looser converter without any highway slip. pair that with a 2.76 or 2.94, and it'll still be a hoot around town, but not be cranking 3000+ RPM going down the freeway at 75 MPH. in my 5th avenue I mentioned above, I was actually running a 3.55 rear gear with a 42RH (A500, the 4 speed OD version of an A998). but to do one of those in an A body will require serious transmission tunnel and torsion bar crossmember modifications.
On an episode of Roadkill Garage, they did a 5.9 swap with the factory acc drive into a Duster and had to move (chop up ? , I can't remember) the battery tray and use a small battery to clear the ps pump.
To be honest... not much! This car will mostly be used to bomb around the outer boroughs of NYC. It is a whole 'nother world here. Probably won't see much high-speed use! Or at least, not built with that intention. I do like the 904 recommendation. I also found a 727 lockup trans near me, supposedly NOS from mopar for $850, comes with whole "retrofit kit" including brand new driveshaft, linkage in a box, inspection cover, all brand new from the 80's. But having a lockup trans scares me, I don't know if that a mistake for some reason.
A 5.9l with headers and 4bbl basically makes 300 hp, but if you want a mild cam don't let AJ's made up scenarios stop you from doing it, AJ don't get power is generally added throughout the powerband. Here's a 5.9l with headers and 4bbl, stock cam VS a mild roller comp cam shown on the screen as you can the engine gains from 3,000 rpms+ and no signs of any real loss under 3,000 rpm, so if you want a cam go for it will give you gains you will notice no matter your gearing and stall.
View attachment 1716477327
Here's LA low cr 360, with a bunch of mods VS stock 2bbl, headers, mild ported heads, xe250h and xe268h cams 4bbl etc.. Still makes better power everywhere over stock.
View attachment 1716477334
Got the heads off today.
The cross hatch is still visible, and no ridge, so I'm thinking I should be able to reuse the bore and pistons if luck prevails.
The amount of sludge in the lifter valley is a little concerning though.
Also, does anyone know what that oil cooler is? Is it for the trans? Or the PS system? Or something else?
View attachment 1716477432
View attachment 1716477433
View attachment 1716477434
View attachment 1716477435
Sweet. I figured the whole damn way! That's the only way to hot tank it, right?
I'm doing this on a budget, but its important to me to be thorough ... and have nice paint job on the motor. I did a 2k hemi orange paint on a 440 and it was just so damn beautiful. I think this one I'll do in blue.
might be buying a 904 tonight.
What would be a good convertor to use?
Mild 360, mild cam, my rear gears I'm sure are 2.xx
I think it’s 70,71 (don’t quote me though) where the 904 got part throttle kickdown. I’d look for a trans that has it already. It’s not a deal breaker because you can add it, but it is another cost.
Why no hone, bearings, rings? That stuff isn't that expensive...
I used an A body manifold.For the driver's side manifold, did you have to use an A-body manifold, or did you use a B or E body 318 manifold? thanks
Other than a new oil pump and pickup, I would probably not TOUCH the bottom end. The lowest-budget parts are the ones already there! Plastigage the bearings and send it.
Hey thanks for all your info man. Question on this. I want to tear the whole motor down so I can bring it in to get hot tanked. The amount of sludge I saw makes me really want to do this, also I want to get a good coat of paint on her too. So, your logic about the bearings makes sense, but I am wondering if I can tear it down, inspect the bearings, and if they look good, reuse the bearings? And so the same with the rings. It would save me probably $200 give or take, and every penny counts on this build. But not sure if its worth it..
Also, reusing the convertor from slant 6 is a cool idea I had not thought of. I didn't even know that was possible. I think I'll do this, especially if I may be upgrading down the line with a different rear end, and changing the converter to match. Question, if I am rebuilding the 904 I found, is it a bad idea to use the old, used convertor with the rebuild trans?
Hey thanks for all your info man. Question on this. I want to tear the whole motor down so I can bring it in to get hot tanked. The amount of sludge I saw makes me really want to do this, also I want to get a good coat of paint on her too. So, your logic about the bearings makes sense, but I am wondering if I can tear it down, inspect the bearings, and if they look good, reuse the bearings? And so the same with the rings. It would save me probably $200 give or take, and every penny counts on this build. But not sure if its worth it..
Also, reusing the convertor from slant 6 is a cool idea I had not thought of. I didn't even know that was possible. I think I'll do this, especially if I may be upgrading down the line with a different rear end, and changing the converter to match. Question, if I am rebuilding the 904 I found, is it a bad idea to use the old, used convertor with the rebuild trans?
i think if you're in that far, it's in for a penny, in for a pound. i understand a shoe-string budget but personally, i think that's kind of false economy on the bearings and rings once you're that deep.
that being said, if everything looks minty and the clearances are acceptable? *shrugs* sure why not. just make sure everything is labeled precisely.
the problem with running an old converter in a freshly built trans is that you're gonna cycle whatever old junk is in there right on thru your new hotness. at the very least find a way to flush it if you can. or most of it.
It's unbelievable. The sad part is how many people on here get suckered into believing his crap. Then when you start to question him, he cries about being attacked and questions your Christianity. lolDisregard that guy. He's obsessed with some **** he had twenty years ago. Every thread always gets side tracked to needing 200psi compression and 4.11s.
This ^^^^^ is the kinda thing you need to listen to. You can tell when someone has actually DONE it VS someone who hasn't done anything in 20 plus years. Ole Kenny there has probably modded more stuff in his lifetime that we'd all like to hear about. I'll also add this. I BELIEVE the Magnum truck manifolds with the 2 1/8" openings will fit the 67 and up A bodies. I'm unsure if they fit with power steering, but I know I've seen some guys here do it. You might look into that as well.I have a 360 magnum in a 1974 Duster. I used a 318 manifold on the driver's side and the manifold from a 1999 Dodge pickup in the passenger side. I hogged out the 318 manifold to match the ports and made the outlet as big as possible without weakening it too much. I did have to grind the head a little bit in the area near the rear head bolt for clearance with the 318 manifold. I have the Eddy Air Gap which works fine with the accessory drive from the 1999 truck. Mine is a factory air car so I'm using the A/C compressor and all from the truck. I didn't research enough prior to and used the truck PS bracket so I had to move my battery to the other side of the car like a Ford. I has plenty of power through those exhaust manifolds. Exhaust pipe is a pain in the tail with that tight turn on the driver's side though coming off the 318 manifold. I cut a bunch of slices of a 2 1/4" pipe and welded them together to make a tight elbow instead of making an elbow that's half crushed to death using a pipe bender.
But where's the fruit?yeah man, that's the juice you need to bring the smoothie together.
Every single internal part of an engine has a tolerance, a measurement, or a specification, that can be measured and compared to the service manual. Any parts that measure within a specific range can be reused. Any parts measured outside of that range need to be replaced. It’s that simple. Rings, bearings, pistons, lifters, camshaft, they all fall in to this category. I’ve torn down a bunch of magnums, rings are almost always ok, bottom end bearings are almost always ok, (unless the plenum gasket was bad and the engine was eating oil, then the rod bearings are trashed). The cam bearings are 50/50, usually that’s what determines my level of “rebuild”. If you do replace Rod/main and cam bearings you need to get out your measuring tools and set all the clearances. If you reuse them, you know it ran before so you at least know it had clearance and oil pressure.Hey thanks for all your info man. Question on this. I want to tear the whole motor down so I can bring it in to get hot tanked. The amount of sludge I saw makes me really want to do this, also I want to get a good coat of paint on her too. So, your logic about the bearings makes sense, but I am wondering if I can tear it down, inspect the bearings, and if they look good, reuse the bearings? And so the same with the rings. It would save me probably $200 give or take, and every penny counts on this build. But not sure if its worth it..
Also, reusing the convertor from slant 6 is a cool idea I had not thought of. I didn't even know that was possible. I think I'll do this, especially if I may be upgrading down the line with a different rear end, and changing the converter to match. Question, if I am rebuilding the 904 I found, is it a bad idea to use the old, used convertor with the rebuild trans?
Don't know if its been mentioned but pay attention to head gasket thickness. Some are .054 inch, others are .039, and some thinner ones too.
distance to the flat area is what you're concerned about. when I built my mag headed 318 years ago I used thin gaskets, I think they were Mopar Performance and .024" thick, but looks like those are NLA. Cometic also has .027" thick ones, too...Oh yeah, good note.
So I measured my piston to deck clearance, using a dial gauge. Not sure if you are supposed to measure from the dished portion of the piston, or the higher, flat area of the piston, so i did both.
My measurements were:
On MagnumSwap.com, they recommend using .028 thick gaskets, saying "Fortunately, there’s an easy solution for getting some of that compression back — opt for a skinnier-than-stock head gasket. We used Mr Gasket .028 thick gaskets on our shop car, and we’ve never had a failure or a leak. They’re about half the thickness of a stock gasket."
- .0435 to flat area
- .0565 to dished area
Anyone have any success with a gasket of that thickness?
Also, anyone know where I can get replacement dowels that go on the block deck? I was going to pull those out to better clean up the deck surface.
The teardown continues. Right now a few of the lifters are stuck in their bores and are soaking in Kroil.
For what you’re doing with the car just get stock gaskets. Forget about deck clearance, or compression ratio, or any other stuff that makes no difference to your goals. Put it together stock and it will meet your target and be dead stone axe reliable.Oh yeah, good note.
So I measured my piston to deck clearance, using a dial gauge. Not sure if you are supposed to measure from the dished portion of the piston, or the higher, flat area of the piston, so i did both.
My measurements were:
On MagnumSwap.com, they recommend using .028 thick gaskets, saying "Fortunately, there’s an easy solution for getting some of that compression back — opt for a skinnier-than-stock head gasket. We used Mr Gasket .028 thick gaskets on our shop car, and we’ve never had a failure or a leak. They’re about half the thickness of a stock gasket."
- .0435 to flat area
- .0565 to dished area
Anyone have any success with a gasket of that thickness?
Also, anyone know where I can get replacement dowels that go on the block deck? I was going to pull those out to better clean up the deck surface.
The teardown continues. Right now a few of the lifters are stuck in their bores and are soaking in Kroil.
This
Fel-Pro 519 SD Fel-Pro Head Gaskets | Summit Racing
Or this
Fel-Pro 9898 PT Fel-Pro Head Gaskets | Summit Racing
Will serve your planned uses well. And you won’t have to adjust pushrod length or adjust anything else.