So, new SS springs it is. I know a lot of guys who run a snubber with SS springs.. to each their own, but they were NOT designed to run with a snubber.
I disagree with this idea of not to run one because they weren’t designed to use one. Reason being, at a stock spring level, there is a snubber. And most engines of the era were not strong enough to “NEED” a snubbed but yet the cars cams with them. Of the cars that had the engine to bend the spring to make use of the snubber, the Chrysler design worked.
Now with the SS springs, the arc is changed but the possible need for them remains the same. The Sox & Martin adjustable pinion snubber (now a MP part) is suggested for use with manual trans cars at a 1/2 inch to a 0 distance from the contact point. Not preloaded.
There use on automatic cars isn’t exactly needed (as MP writes) but suggested for safety & extremes @ 1 - 2 inches.
Just for the record.. before the CalTracs made their debut (1990?), there were LOTS of guys in Stock Eliminator with shivi's and phords (even John Calvert) running Mopar SS springs. None of them used a snubber. (that I know of..) Just sayin..[/QUOTE]
While probably true (not arguing!) Did they run the Chrysler rear in the GM/Ford car? I have seen Chevies back in the day run the Chrysler banjo rear & SS springs (as well as swapped in 727’s.)
Never a Ford though....
But! As I was getting to... the GM rear has no provision for a snubber. IDK about a Ford rear.
The springs are pretty good alone as well a little better when the front half is clamped and the rear half is set free. (Unclamped)