Overlap vs. Wider LSA - Detonation Resistance?

-
Zero correlation to hp

Let me say it this way.

I’ve seen absolutely no correlation between cranking compression and detonation or more accurately detonation resistance.

I have seen engines bumping 155 on the gauge rattle like crazy and 200 not rattle at all. I haven’t checked my engine yet with a calculator (it’s sitting on the dyno as I type this, but I had a PAYING job come in so my junk comes off tomorrow so I can do that then mine goes back on and I suspect I will make 75-80 pulls minimum unless it craps itself) but I will here in a bit get on Wallace and see what mine should be, but it better be 195. 200-205 is where I think I want to be. Over 210 I may wet myself a bit.

What I see related to cranking compression is the higher it is the smaller the tune up window is.

That means that you have less margin for error. Things like your timing curve, engine coolant temperature, spark plug heat range and much less obvious things like your overall first gear ratio, rear axle ratio converter stall speed or clutch tune up and most importantly how the driver drive the car become critical.

So if the engine temp climbs 15 degrees (talking sticks here or manually shifted slush boxes) and the driver doesnt down shift and is running a gear high you will rattle the engine where it wouldn’t if the coolant temperature was where it should be.

Another example is spark plug heat range. If it’s a drag car the plug can be a bit hot (it can never be a glow plug but it’s criminal how many guys run a plug thats too hot) but a car that is on a road course you can’t be any too hot.

That’s why I call unorthodox pump gas compression ratio engines (I suppose that would be depending on who you ask anything over 10:1 but I consider anything over 11.5:1 on pump gas unorthodox) some of the most difficult to teach the end user how to use it. I’ve been teaching it for better than 35 years and guys still refuse to believe it can be done.

The short answer is I look at cranking compression as how wide or big the tune up window is. So I suppose in that sense cranking compression can be related to detonation sensitivity but as I said before, I’ve seen pretty low cranking compressions rattle bad.

I almost forgot. RING SEAL and OIL CONTROL is beyond critical in unorthodox pump gas compression ratio engines. If the engine is using a quart per 1k miles and you are hitting the gauge at 180 it’s going to be hard to keep it from rattling. At 195 you just about cant do it. You’ll be running plugs so cold they fouls at low loads and the timing will be so retarded the exhaust gas temperature are screaming and it will still rattle.

Oil control is absolutely critical if you want to bump more than 185 on the gauge. You really need at a minimum a fully functioning PVC system. If you can use a Panevac over that all the better. Or if you are a bucks up dude you can use a vacuum pump. But you have to control the oil getting to the cylinders.

To that end, if your machinist isnt using a profilometer to measure the source geometry of the bores get a new machinist. If he still thinks a ductile iron moly filled top ring is the ****, take your parts and run.

I’ll go run my numbers on Wallace and see what it says my junk should do and post it and then when I get my trash checked I’ll post that follow up here.
Out of curiosity, have you seen very efficient exhaust raise your dynamic compression on the top of your rpm cycle?

The GT/ class racers claimed that their combinations (9.5:1 factory intake runner cc and production iron head) would gain cylinder pressure at the top of the rpm cycle with a tight lSA due to a very efficient exhaust creating a "negative pressure under overlap."

"If I understood correctly."

They were dialed in at 10.5 sec. 6000+ da (something was going on!)
 
Last edited:
Out of curiosity, have you seen very efficient exhaust raise your dynamic compression on the top of your rpm cycle?

The GT/ class racers claimed that their combinations (9.5:1 factory intake runner cc and production iron head) would gain cylinder pressure at the top of the rpm cycle with a tight lSA due to a very efficient exhaust creating a "negative pressure under overlap."

"If I understood correctly."

They were dialed in at 10.5 sec. 6000+ da (something was going on!)


I can believe that. How they are measuring it I don’t know.

I spend way more time looking at effective compression ratio than dynamic because I can calculate that.
 
Here is what Wallace shows my garbage pumping. I used the best uncorrected barometer I’ve seen here so if I get to sea level it will go another 8-10 PSI.
IMG_0080.png


So you can see Im on the edge for pump gas as far as my current tuning abilities go. Or so I tell myself.

Im doing some water pump testing on the dyno when I get to it so I can pump/belt power losses as the overdrive ratio goes up. I know I have 6% and 22% overdrive ratio pulling out there. I’d love to find some around 12-15% over but you just can’t buy the stuff.
 
I can believe that. How they are measuring it I don’t know.

I spend way more time looking at effective compression ratio than dynamic because I can calculate that.
It seems there would be a fine line between the cam lobes ability to move enough air vs closing at the most effective degree.
 
Last edited:
Detonation usually boils down to chamber shape, size, whether there are sharp edges that can cause hot spots, including the piston top, and also things like fuel mixture and not the least of which, engine temperatures.
The quote is from Larry, Atherton and Bob Mullins research with the modified TA production cylnder head. I thought I read 32* total advance somewhere.

Side bar: do you know any of the engine builders for the southeast Gassers and or are they running anywhere in Georgia during the spring?

IMG_4453.jpeg


IMG_4456.jpeg


IMG_4455.jpeg
 
Perhaps my terminology is wrong. I just couldn’t understand the science behind the low compression and their ability to run that ET.


Well, thats my fault. I grew up tuning two strokes so effective compression ratio is what I learned first. Some guys use the two terms interchangeably but I don’t know why or how they do it.

If you look at what I posted my static compression ratio is 12.0:1 and that is measured and I had to fight that short stroke turd to get it. But my EFFECTIVE compression ratio is only 9.47:1 and thats based off rod length and intake valve closing. You can’t make pressure with the valve open.

That can be mathematically calculated.

Dynamic compression ratio is just that. Dynamic. That means that load, volumetric efficiency (which in your above example makes perfectly good sense…the headers and the cam timing tuned up nicely at high rpm, increased the volumetric efficiency and the power goes up so that makes sense) and rpm change the dynamic compression ratio.

Like I said, they are data logging every run and Im betting they know exactly what the VE is at every rpm in every gear and they can calculate dynamic compression ratio.
 
Well, thats my fault. I grew up tuning two strokes so effective compression ratio is what I learned first. Some guys use the two terms interchangeably but I don’t know why or how they do it.

If you look at what I posted my static compression ratio is 12.0:1 and that is measured and I had to fight that short stroke turd to get it. But my EFFECTIVE compression ratio is only 9.47:1 and thats based off rod length and intake valve closing. You can’t make pressure with the valve open.

That can be mathematically calculated.

Dynamic compression ratio is just that. Dynamic. That means that load, volumetric efficiency (which in your above example makes perfectly good sense…the headers and the cam timing tuned up nicely at high rpm, increased the volumetric efficiency and the power goes up so that makes sense) and rpm change the dynamic compression ratio.

Like I said, they are data logging every run and Im betting they know exactly what the VE is at every rpm in every gear and they can calculate dynamic compression ratio.
I happen to get a peak into Billy Glidden‘s trailer at Indy this year and the laptop was open with the data Logging maps that you’re speaking of.

Some people are more fortunate than the rest of us, but at least they pave the way for success.
 
The quote is from Larry, Atherton and Bob Mullins research with the modified TA production cylnder head. I thought I read 32* total advance somewhere.

Side bar: do you know any of the engine builders for the southeast Gassers and or are they running anywhere in Georgia during the spring?

View attachment 1716489526

View attachment 1716489527

View attachment 1716489528
Yes, I'm sure they will run in Georgia in the spring. I have a local friend who is in that group. He'll know some of those builders, I'm sure. He has two nostalgia slingshot dragsters.
 
#1 intake/exhaust
View attachment 1716489558

#2 intake/exhaust
View attachment 1716489559

All else being equal, which one is more detonation resistant?
Hydraulic or solid lifters? The 46* is going to have a little less cylnder pressure. If you running anything lower than a 2.94:1 axle and a stock torque converter You would be fine on pump fuel with those numbers.

PM one of the folks on hear and have them help you get the “tune” plugs/ignition curve figured out.

You’re in Ca, so the “%” of ethanol is probably pretty inconsistent.
 
Last edited:
At what compression ratio? Let's say it's 11.5:1 static

All else being equal between those two, which one is more detonation resistant?
Steep. I’d want an intake valve closing in the low to mid 50* range @.050”.

You’re in N.B.T. tuning territory with a short intake valve, closing timing and 11.5:1 compression. I’m not saying it can’t be done, but it’s beyond what I’ve done.

For example, I’m running 10 1/2 cc domes with a Chrysler 308 head. Close to your compression ratio. My intake valve closing timing I believe is just under 50° but I am at 4700 foot. Elevation runs like an SOB on 93 pump.
 
At what compression ratio? Let's say it's 11.5:1 static

All else being equal between those two, which one is more detonation resistant?

Someone already said you do not change cam timing to control detonation.

If you do that the torque will be junk, the power curve will be narrow and peaky and it will drive like garbage.

I should do a post on how to do high compression pump gas engines but it would be so long no one would read it.

I would suggest you learn how to control detonation without hacking the cam timing around to try and control it.

I see this all the time. It’s the same (except a bit different but the end result is the same) as the guy who builds a 10:1 engine but wants a 2500 converter, 3.23 gears with a 28 inch tall tire and he wants to shift at 6500.

Torque will be down. Hard. It will drive like cooked turds. It will rattle its brains out on tip in and if it goes to the track it won’t run anywhere near the dyno numbers.

And the rail birds, shoe polish tuners and general civilian types will say the dyno lied.

The reality is the dyno told the truth. Peak power is ok but peak power doesn’t get the car down the track.

The reality is the engine is garbage not the dyno.
 

At what compression ratio? Let's say it's 11.5:1 static

All else being equal between those two, which one is more detonation resistant?
Schneider 142F La grind is in the car now. Its done at 5800 with 3.91:1
I have a Schneider 248/256 @.550 that I would like to swap out for a little more "pop up top."

Always SFT unless its for the station wagon...
 
Steep. I’d want an intake valve closing in the low to mid 50* range @.050”.

You’re in N.B.T. tuning territory with a short intake valve, closing timing and 11.5:1 compression. I’m not saying it can’t be done, but it’s beyond what I’ve done.

For example, I’m running 10 1/2 cc domes with a Chrysler 308 head. Close to your compression ratio. My intake valve closing timing I believe is just under 50° but I am at 4700 foot. Elevation runs like an SOB on 93 pump.
Thanks. To be clear, it's not my engine. Just trying to make sense of completely conflicting information I've been told. I think it's pretty clear at this point.
 
I’m in on the “tuning for pump gas” webinar. Could you detail the effect of fuel additives too?
Someone already said you do not change cam timing to control detonation.

If you do that the torque will be junk, the power curve will be narrow and peaky and it will drive like garbage.

I should do a post on how to do high compression pump gas engines but it would be so long no one would read it.

I would suggest you learn how to control detonation without hacking the cam timing around to try and control it.

I see this all the time. It’s the same (except a bit different but the end result is the same) as the guy who builds a 10:1 engine but wants a 2500 converter, 3.23 gears with a 28 inch tall tire and he wants to shift at 6500.

Torque will be down. Hard. It will drive like cooked turds. It will rattle its brains out on tip in and if it goes to the track it won’t run anywhere near the dyno numbers.

And the rail birds, shoe polish tuners and general civilian types will say the dyno lied.

The reality is the dyno told the truth. Peak power is ok but peak power doesn’t get the car down the track.

The reality is the engine is garbage not the dyno.
"And the rail birds, shoe polish tuners and general civilian types..."

Win light!
 
Last edited:
Thanks. To be clear, it's not my engine. Just trying to make sense of completely conflicting information I've been told. I think it's pretty clear at this point.


Just so I’m clear, I know guys kill cylinder pressure to reduce the tendency to detonate.

Does it work? Not really for what I said above. If you want to run higher than orthodox compression on pump gas you need to:

Control engine coolant temperature. Anything over 11:1 and the coolant temperature needs to be 160-170 TOPS when rolling down the road. It can creep up 8-10 degrees at long stop lights and such but that’s it.

Control inlet air temperature by running a cold air intake manifold. That means no exhaust heat crossover ever. And an intake that has a gap like a Strip Dominator. Notice I didnt say RPM air gap. I’ll address that later.

Absolutely you must have a timing curve. By that I mean a curve with 1.5-2.0 degrees increase per 1000 rpm. That is non negotiable. You absolutely can NOT have the same ignition timing at peak torque and peak power.

To control engine temperature you need a high flow water pump. A quality high flow thermostat like Stewart Components. That’s the only one I use.

You absolutely MUST overdrive the water pump. At the very worst you need to be driving the pump at crank speed. That is the bare assed minimum. I’m starting my testing with an electric pump. Then I’ll switch to my mechanical pump with my 6% over pulleys. Then I’ll drop on the 20% over pulleys or whatever they are. I’m looking for the power losses. I’ll give up 15 or even 20 if I have to, to keep the temperature at 160. Because if it goes over that then you need to pull timing and that kills power. You must control engine temperature and cold engines make more powa! Mo powa is always best.

Your parts selections are critical. I will not do 11:1 pump gas on a dual plane intake manifold. If you try it you are stepping on your own dick. BTDT. It’s unpleasant to say the least.

Cylinder to cylinder distribution is horrendous at best and you have to tune to the leanest cylinder and set the timing to the fastest burn. You can’t tune high compression pump gas engines doing that. That’s why so many guys end up mixing in race gas. Fuel distribution is paramount and really with a tunnel ram I think I could do 12.75:1 on pump gas if I screwed around with it long enough.

If you are married to a dual plane intake drop your compression ratio.

The other thing that can’t be done is running the engine too far under peak torque and then slamming your foot through the floor and not expect the engine to rattle its teeth out. Driving is a huge factor in how much compression you can use on pump gas. If you think rolling along in high gear at 2000 rpm and then standing the butterflies on end is cool these type of engines is unacceptable.

The last thing (but not the least) is spark plugs. Type and heat range is uber critical.

Opening a plug catalog picking a street plug is a guaranteed parts killer.

For my junk I’m starting with a C61YC Champion on the dyno because my best educated assumption is it will need a C63CX in the car.

Those are racing plug heat ranges. Trying to run a street plug heat range will destroy parts so fast you’ll need race gas mix at the minimum to keep from killing everything.

And you have to learn to read your plugs. If you live in an area like I do where I can run my local track and be anywhere from 2500 feet DA to easily over 5000 feet DA and in 3.5 hours I can be at the track I grew up on and in the spring and fall that place can go MINUS 500-1000 feet DA!!

That’s Disney Land **** right there. But if you can’t read a plug and you can see DA swings like that you’ll be in trouble. As the DA goes down I start dropping the heat range one for every 1k.

If the engine is on the edge for some reason I will pull a degree of timing for every 1k loss of DA. If I have some room I’ll drop 1 degree for every 2k drop in DA.

But the plug is the key. It will tell you exactly what the engine wants. I have tuned engines that needed two different heat ranges to make it happy. It drive guys bonkers but there isn’t a rule that says every cylinder wants the same heat range. You see that with dual plane intakes and some single plane intakes.

You have to be confident in what you see on the plug and then do it.

Of course carb tuning is paramount.

I don’t run these engines with anything but quality annular boosters unless the carb(s) are on the small side.

You have to get the fuel atomized pretty good by the time the fuel is at the opening of the runner so that the greatest amount of fuel is fully vaporized when the plug fires. Liquid fuel will not burn.

So prepping the fuel before it gets to the cylinder is a big deal. You start getting big drops of fuel when the plug goes off the plug will look lean but the exhaust ports will look dead rich. I see that all the time. The fuel burns too late to make power so EGT goes bonkers high and that makes its own mess.

That’s about all I can think of now. Unorthodox compression ratios on pump gas are what I consider pretty easily doable. It takes plenty of forethought but it can be done.

The benefits include a broader, fatter torque and power curves. Far better engine efficiency. The engine will run cleaner.

The engine will drive better. Far better. It’s amazing to drive a car that is done correctly. Even at 11:1. It tames big cams. It’s just hard to explain.

It is more work but IMO it’s beyond worth the extra worth.

Also, when I’m testing my trash I’ll be testing at cruise loading with my fuel pressure regulator. I want to see how far I can drop the fuel pressure with manifold vacuum at a cruise to lean the engine down a bit and get some fuel efficiency back.

And I’m going to test and see if I can tune the distributor well enough to use ported vacuum on the vacuum advance for the above reasons.

I’m looking forward to seeing if I can do it. If I can that will be all the better for fuel efficiency and cruise power and drivability.
 
You will not know whether a particular cam, wide or tight LSA causes detonation......until you try it. It is MUCH more than just the cam events. Engine temp is crucial.
I had a sizable roller cam in my 455 Pontiac. Different 4 bbl intakes, different carbs, 800 Edel AFB, TQs. The dist had a curve in it, not locked. Our fuel octane rating here is about 3-4#s higher than the US number. All non-ethanol. I was using 98, so about 95 US number. Iron heads, 9.9:1 CR, headers. I had done a lot of work improving the cooling system [ front of engine modified to take an Edel Victor water pump]. Rock steady 180* temp, needle never moved more than about 1/10" no matter how hot it was. I had played with the dist curve to avoid detonation. I got it pretty good so that I just got light throttle ping going up a hill on a hot day.
In 2005, I put 4 Weber 48 IDF carbs on the engine with a home made IR manifold. Still on it today. Only the induction was changed, same heads & short block. With the 4bbl, I was using 98 octane. I use 91 octane with the Ws & in the 20 yrs I have had them on the engine, I have never had detonation. I use a locked dist with 35* & add 13* at idle with MVA so that the engine idles with 48*. I put the detonation down to A/F distribution: leanness. Not a single cyl runs lean. I use NGK 4 heat range plugs, 0.090" gap, with a smooth 800 rpm idle, in gear. Cam is ground on 106* LSA.

img027.jpg
 
Just so I’m clear, I know guys kill cylinder pressure to reduce the tendency to detonate.

Does it work? Not really for what I said above. If you want to run higher than orthodox compression on pump gas you need to:

Control engine coolant temperature. Anything over 11:1 and the coolant temperature needs to be 160-170 TOPS when rolling down the road. It can creep up 8-10 degrees at long stop lights and such but that’s it.

Control inlet air temperature by running a cold air intake manifold. That means no exhaust heat crossover ever. And an intake that has a gap like a Strip Dominator. Notice I didnt say RPM air gap. I’ll address that later.

Absolutely you must have a timing curve. By that I mean a curve with 1.5-2.0 degrees increase per 1000 rpm. That is non negotiable. You absolutely can NOT have the same ignition timing at peak torque and peak power.

To control engine temperature you need a high flow water pump. A quality high flow thermostat like Stewart Components. That’s the only one I use.

You absolutely MUST overdrive the water pump. At the very worst you need to be driving the pump at crank speed. That is the bare assed minimum. I’m starting my testing with an electric pump. Then I’ll switch to my mechanical pump with my 6% over pulleys. Then I’ll drop on the 20% over pulleys or whatever they are. I’m looking for the power losses. I’ll give up 15 or even 20 if I have to, to keep the temperature at 160. Because if it goes over that then you need to pull timing and that kills power. You must control engine temperature and cold engines make more powa! Mo powa is always best.

Your parts selections are critical. I will not do 11:1 pump gas on a dual plane intake manifold. If you try it you are stepping on your own dick. BTDT. It’s unpleasant to say the least.

Cylinder to cylinder distribution is horrendous at best and you have to tune to the leanest cylinder and set the timing to the fastest burn. You can’t tune high compression pump gas engines doing that. That’s why so many guys end up mixing in race gas. Fuel distribution is paramount and really with a tunnel ram I think I could do 12.75:1 on pump gas if I screwed around with it long enough.

If you are married to a dual plane intake drop your compression ratio.

The other thing that can’t be done is running the engine too far under peak torque and then slamming your foot through the floor and not expect the engine to rattle its teeth out. Driving is a huge factor in how much compression you can use on pump gas. If you think rolling along in high gear at 2000 rpm and then standing the butterflies on end is cool these type of engines is unacceptable.

The last thing (but not the least) is spark plugs. Type and heat range is uber critical.

Opening a plug catalog picking a street plug is a guaranteed parts killer.

For my junk I’m starting with a C61YC Champion on the dyno because my best educated assumption is it will need a C63CX in the car.

Those are racing plug heat ranges. Trying to run a street plug heat range will destroy parts so fast you’ll need race gas mix at the minimum to keep from killing everything.

And you have to learn to read your plugs. If you live in an area like I do where I can run my local track and be anywhere from 2500 feet DA to easily over 5000 feet DA and in 3.5 hours I can be at the track I grew up on and in the spring and fall that place can go MINUS 500-1000 feet DA!!

That’s Disney Land **** right there. But if you can’t read a plug and you can see DA swings like that you’ll be in trouble. As the DA goes down I start dropping the heat range one for every 1k.

If the engine is on the edge for some reason I will pull a degree of timing for every 1k loss of DA. If I have some room I’ll drop 1 degree for every 2k drop in DA.

But the plug is the key. It will tell you exactly what the engine wants. I have tuned engines that needed two different heat ranges to make it happy. It drive guys bonkers but there isn’t a rule that says every cylinder wants the same heat range. You see that with dual plane intakes and some single plane intakes.

You have to be confident in what you see on the plug and then do it.

Of course carb tuning is paramount.

I don’t run these engines with anything but quality annular boosters unless the carb(s) are on the small side.

You have to get the fuel atomized pretty good by the time the fuel is at the opening of the runner so that the greatest amount of fuel is fully vaporized when the plug fires. Liquid fuel will not burn.

So prepping the fuel before it gets to the cylinder is a big deal. You start getting big drops of fuel when the plug goes off the plug will look lean but the exhaust ports will look dead rich. I see that all the time. The fuel burns too late to make power so EGT goes bonkers high and that makes its own mess.

That’s about all I can think of now. Unorthodox compression ratios on pump gas are what I consider pretty easily doable. It takes plenty of forethought but it can be done.

The benefits include a broader, fatter torque and power curves. Far better engine efficiency. The engine will run cleaner.

The engine will drive better. Far better. It’s amazing to drive a car that is done correctly. Even at 11:1. It tames big cams. It’s just hard to explain.

It is more work but IMO it’s beyond worth the extra worth.

Also, when I’m testing my trash I’ll be testing at cruise loading with my fuel pressure regulator. I want to see how far I can drop the fuel pressure with manifold vacuum at a cruise to lean the engine down a bit and get some fuel efficiency back.

And I’m going to test and see if I can tune the distributor well enough to use ported vacuum on the vacuum advance for the above reasons.

I’m looking forward to seeing if I can do it. If I can that will be all the better for fuel efficiency and cruise power and drivability.
This: "The engine will drive better. Far better. It’s amazing to drive a car that is done correctly. Even at 11:1. It tames big cams. It’s just hard to explain."

My SFT (Schneider 142F La) is fairly mild at 242/242 (11:1) but it idles smooth like my 318 pick up.

Thanks for taking the time to explain the tuning process and the theory behind the facts.

Any leads on different pulley ratios for the Chrysler water pump and crankshaft.
 
Last edited:
This: "The engine will drive better. Far better. It’s amazing to drive a car that is done correctly. Even at 11:1. It tames big cams. It’s just hard to explain."

My SFT (Schneider 142F La) is fairly mild at 242/242 (11:1) but it idles smooth like my 318 pick up.

Thanks for taking the time to explain the tuning process and the theory behind the facts.

Any leads on different pulley ratios for the Chrysler water pump and crankshaft.
That's kinda how I describe my slant 6. Even though the cam is rowdy with 250@.050 on a 108, it actually idles very well and is easy to drive.
 
That's kinda how I describe my slant 6. Even though the cam is rowdy with 250@.050 on a 108, it actually idles very well and is easy to drive.


It’s just amazing how well you can make these things drive with cam timing most guys consider unstreetable if you just get the compression up and tune accordingly.

It’s just almost unbelievable.
 
No, those lobes were developed by Racer Brown.
from what I recall racer brown were all the odd number cams lists 471 ,509 ,557 . they worked . I remember they changed the 471 to 474 with a different supplier and that took all the snot out of the torque. Back in the 70's the odd numbers were the good mopar cams from mopar. Racer brown cams were expensive when ordered direct compared to Mopar Cams .
 
It’s just amazing how well you can make these things drive with cam timing most guys consider unstreetable if you just get the compression up and tune accordingly.

It’s just almost unbelievable.
I love it. If I'm not feeling well, I drive it and then everything's better. lol
 
-
Back
Top Bottom