Unity Motorsports Doing their 318 Project!

-
While I like the premise of building a 318 I don’t get sticking with a 2 barrel and little valves . You will probably have to buy new valves so why not go a little bigger ? And stock 4bbl intakes are cheap .
Plus ..all that custom work costs far more than buying parts and very few people are capable of doing it.
Should have ported the heads with a little larger valves , used stock crank , ported a TQ factory intake and decked heads / block for compression.
Then supertune the timing and an old Thermoquad .

yeah.. i could see this if they were say, building a motor for a certain class.. rules: no 4bbl, stock iron heads, stock intake.. then this would be a fun exercise to see what could be done.. but come on.. i don't see anyone that would ever do this kinda work on stock parts when even used stuff would have a better cost/time used gain.. When i got my 318 i went with new heads with a more modern chamber, things have changed in 40+ years..
 
I like Uncle Tony and tune in to most of his stuff when I can. I can see how he would annoy some people though, I get it, but I like his focus on working with what you have, keeping stuff within the era it was originally done and passing on his experience to the next generation. I’m definitely not the next generation, being in my late 50’s and working on cars since I was a kid. But what I do like more than anything, is making ‘junk’ run great!

I’ve had and still have 340’s and stroker small blocks that run hard, these are always great and never go out of favour. But there’s something so cool about putting some time & effort into a 273, 318, 360 and making ‘em sing. I’m able to port cylinder heads, not great, but they seem to work. I have a decent understanding of camshaft specs and what seems to work with various static compression ratios. Like most here, I understand the importance of dynamic compression and the closing point of the intake valve etc. It’s all about the intended use and overall combo, that either makes the thing shine or suck.

Some of the cars that UTG works on are a little Rattier than I would like, but the overall idea of working on what you have and doing as much as you can, is a sound one and resonates with me. I know Uncle Tony bailed out of ‘Mission Impossible’ early on because his original idea got derailed, wish he was still involved and they kept to the original plan. Would have been cool to see what they could do with a low compression 318 2BBL, without exotic machining, and then install a 4BBL carb / intake, camshaft and headers and see what additional power it could make. Most of us live in this space.
This is the most well written, and reasonable post on this whole thread. Shitting on other people because you don't like their videos, or their engine builds, or choices, just doesn't make sense. If you don't like their stuff, why are you watching ? Just move on ! Talk about a soap opera !!!! I just like watching the different Mopar videos, because they are just that, Mopar videos and it beats watching Foad or Chebby videos. I'm a big boy, and can pick and choose the info I want as I go. As Moparians, (is that a word) ? we are in the minority, and should stick together, sharing experiences good or bad as we go. That's how we learn right ? Remember: Keep an open mind because your mind is like a parachute. If it ain't open it don't work. Cheers my Moparian brothers !!!!
 
Last edited:
Well lets just say i wouldn't let Uncle tony anywhere near my car...thats not shitting on him is it...? :lol:
 
yeah.. i could see this if they were say, building a motor for a certain class.. rules: no 4bbl, stock iron heads, stock intake.. then this would be a fun exercise to see what could be done.. but come on.. i don't see anyone that would ever do this kinda work on stock parts when even used stuff would have a better cost/time used gain.. When i got my 318 i went with new heads with a more modern chamber, things have changed in 40+ years..
Agreed a lot of it has no practical information, but I'm still interested in what a ported 2bbl intake can do etc.., I didn't have to do it, just watch it and take whatever my brain takes away from this if it's nothing no big loss.
 
yeah.. i could see this if they were say, building a motor for a certain class.. rules: no 4bbl, stock iron heads, stock intake.. then this would be a fun exercise to see what could be done.. but come on.. i don't see anyone that would ever do this kinda work on stock parts when even used stuff would have a better cost/time used gain.. When i got my 318 i went with new heads with a more modern chamber, things have changed in 40+ years..
I built a class car with a 273, and using all that stock stuff is not easy to make them run, especially the tiny carb.
 
Agreed a lot of it has no practical information, but I'm still interested in what a ported 2bbl intake can do etc.., I didn't have to do it, just watch it and take whatever my brain takes away from this if it's nothing no big loss.
I like the porting vids with Servidio and am curious to see the outcome but even he thought it was goofy not to use a $25-50 factory 4 bbl intake .
The point of the build is to see how much power you can make with stock parts but it’s absurd not to use an inexpensive 4 bbl or new pistons .
 
I like the porting vids with Servidio and am curious to see the outcome but even he thought it was goofy not to use a $25-50 factory 4 bbl intake .
The point of the build is to see how much power you can make with stock parts but it’s absurd not to use an inexpensive 4 bbl or new pistons .
True, the only thing I could see the 2bbl mod info be really worth it to someone is if you wanted to build a sleeper that looked 100% like a stock 2bbl 273/318.
 
I built a class car with a 273, and using all that stock stuff is not easy to make them run, especially the tiny carb.
But isn't that what separates the men from the boys? If it was easy everyone would be doing it.
 
This 2 Barrel Stromberg along with the midrise 318 Roller 2 Barrel Intake will make her run.

20250205_092712.jpg


20250205_092732.jpg


20250205_092627.jpg


20230822_230842.jpg

Stock build 360 ^ Weiand Intake on the run stand.

Very responsive this Stromberg. This was a brand new NOS still in the box, bolt on and go.

Works so well I would actually run it in place of a 4 barrel.


☆☆☆☆☆
 
Any Idea what that carb flows?
Minimum of 350 cfm

As compared to the Motocraft 2 barrels in the background, one 350 cfm and the other 500 cfm.

I would say the Stromberg is closer to the 500 cfm, especially the way it ran on the 360 above.


☆☆☆☆☆
 
Minimum of 350 cfm

As compared to the Motocraft 2 barrels in the background, one 350 cfm and the other 500 cfm.

I would say the Stromberg is closer to the 500 cfm, especially the way it ran on the 360 above.


☆☆☆☆☆
No, the minimum listed is 278. The maximum is 435. You need to read the info in the link I posted. It gives you the venturi size so you can measure and find out. That's venturi size though, not throttle bore size. The throttle bore sizes are listed as well, but there are multiples of those with different CFM ratings. The venturi size will narrow it down.
 
I like the porting vids with Servidio and am curious to see the outcome but even he thought it was goofy not to use a $25-50 factory 4 bbl intake .
The point of the build is to see how much power you can make with stock parts but it’s absurd not to use an inexpensive 4 bbl or new pistons .
But would you hog out 318 heads or buy other heads? like Edelbrock or Speedmaster?
 
But would you hog out 318 heads or buy other heads? like Edelbrock or Speedmaster?
No … I like the concept of maximizing the stock parts but it doesn’t make sense to not use cheap and easily accessible parts like a factory 4 bbl . Although it will be interesting to see what the 2 bbl puts out .
 
No … I like the concept of maximizing the stock parts but it doesn’t make sense to not use cheap and easily accessible parts like a factory 4 bbl . Although it will be interesting to see what the 2 bbl puts out .
The only problem is it would cost someone probably 2k-3k in porting alone on those iron heads, intake and tiny carb, so what's the point?
 
The point?

It’s all about the clicks!!!

My take on the first combo is-
A “science experiment” with no practical application.
But to each their own.

The second combo is just a harder way to get to whatever power number they make……. With no real up-side.

But again, to each their own.

Both are examples of “work harder, not smarter” imo.

Still about the clicks…….. that being said, there is no shortage of 500hp 400” videos…….. so let’s see how this one shakes out.
 
Last edited:
The point?

It’s all about the clicks!!!

My take on the first combo is-
A “science experiment” with no practical application.
But to each their own.

The second combo is just a harder way to get to whatever power number they make……. With no real up-side.

But again, to each their own.

Both are examples of “work harder, not smarter” imo.

Still about the clicks…….. that being said, there is no shortage of 500hp 400” videos…….. so let’s see how this one shakes out.
But even if it's about clicks, doubt it was worth their time, there's probably at most a million views between them which is generally about $6,000 to split between them and Charlie probably got the least views doing most of the work.
 
But even if it's about clicks, doubt it was worth their time, there's probably at most a million views between them which is generally about $6,000 to split between them and Charlie probably got the least views doing most of the work.
Man.. i wish i had the personality to make vids.... people won't click to watch me get pissed off and just quit :)
 
Everyone blames clicks which is partially true, but most of these people are barely making money, if you look at their total videos pay and divided by videos done, DV and Unity Motorsports are probably not even averaging $200 a video and Charles is at $15 and those are gross money numbers before any expenses, the reason got to be more than just clicks and money.

Even UTG's is only averaging probably around $500 a video before cost.
 
Everyone blames clicks which is partially true, but most of these people are barely making money, if you look at their total videos pay and divided by videos done, DV and Unity Motorsports are probably not even averaging $200 a video and Charles is at $15 and those are gross money numbers before any expenses, the reason got to be more than just clicks and money.

Even UTG's is only averaging probably around $500 a video before cost.
where did these numbers come from?
 
-
Back
Top