I think I had desktop dyno, it's OK playing around with different cams and heads, but intake exhaust etc.. Is Pretty generic, it ain't gonna tell ya if for eg.. An airgap is better than performer etc..
What are you hoping it will tell ya ?
I don't like it cause it won't work on a Chromebook. lol I wish somebody made something that's work.
it's not gonna give result I'd use to make a choice with between single and dual.
What's your combo ?
I used it for years. I like it. But remember the old adage "garbage in, garbage out". You need to enter as much accurate information as possible. As long as you do that, your results are pretty spot on.
How do you combine tests on the same graph on Dyno2000? I didn't know you could do that.
Cause it uses generic manifolds and results, it don't tell you the results say from an performer vs rpm airgap vs a Victor jr etc.., it will tell a general trend we see between single plane and dual. But we don't need software to tell us a trend we already know. But on the OP's engine the results could be different from the general trend and only way to know that's is test it in the real world.
Going by that graph the hp gains definitely outweigh the small loss down low, but is that a realistic result that will be similar in the OP's case probably not from the dyno test I've seen.
I wouldn't focus so much on the torque loss especially low, looking at torque loss gives an exaggerated view of the loss, what you want is best average hp for whatever your doing, 0-60, 1/4, 1/8 light to light etc..
How'd you plot two tests on the same graph?
