340 or 360?

340 or 360?


  • Total voters
    88
-
Better. Better "at what". As usual, the hit dogs holler and people argue about anything. There's not enough difference between the two to live on. That's the truth, no matter how hard somebody is a 340 ball licker.
 
You just need another streetmaster or 302 head thread to get you through.
Where has that bottomless pit been anyhow? With all his knowledge...you would think we would be reading an abundance of threads by him where he shows us 11's on a shoestring budget with 302 heads, oddball obsolete swap meet intake manifolds and some 3.23's
 
What's the purpose of boring it 0.080"? Wouldn't that cause over heating issues? I believe in only boring a engine enough to clean up the bores. There's article's on people running 1.925" intake valve's and port work that give just as good or better flow numbers than people who use 2.020" intake valve's. Attention to bowl area is important.


There is more to cylinder heads than flow. Flow numbers are pretty low on my list of important things.
 

400's were dogs from the factory..a "boat anchor" 318 would beat it:D:D:D

Hell, I thought everyone here knew the 318 was the pinnacle of Mopar small block power, maybe even more potential than the legendary 426 Hemi! :rofl:
 
Better. Better "at what". As usual, the hit dogs holler and people argue about anything. There's not enough difference between the two to live on. That's the truth, no matter how hard somebody is a 340 ball licker.
I can't see where your personal hobbies have anything to do with this:lol:
 
-
Back
Top Bottom