I think that’s a fair high-level description, and a lot of people hit the same wall when they first look into crypto. At its core, the math and cryptography are there to remove the need for trust in a central authority. Miners or validators aren’t just “printing money” at random; they’re being rewarded for securing the network and following very strict rules coded into the protocol, usually with a fixed or predictable supply schedule. And you’re right about backing - crypto isn’t backed by a physical asset, but neither are modern fiat currencies; both ultimately derive value from collective trust, adoption, and utility.That said, this is also where projects like
Banana Pro try to differentiate themselves. Instead of focusing only on mining or raw transaction processing, Banana Pro aims to build utility and community-driven value on top of blockchain technology. Whether it succeeds or not depends on execution, transparency, and real-world use cases, but it’s a good example of how crypto has evolved beyond just “math and computers” into ecosystems, products, and brands that people choose to support - similar, in a way, to how fiat money relies on confidence and participation rather than hard backing.