FWIW, on the 36 entries here so far, we've got an average of 14.702.
It doesn't always play out that way, so who knows. It will be about 3900 lbs at the start line is my guess.325 hp gross and 3600 lbs I think 13.6 will be the number but I guessed 14.85 I know nothing he he ha ha
Dan
| 1/4 Mile ET: | 12.72 seconds |
| 1/4 Mile Speed: | 100.55 MPH : 161.82 KPH |
| Ideal Gear Ratio: | 3.86 |
I don't think that math includes torque converter slippage. If it runs a 12.72, I will make snow angels in the summer.... LOL. But hey, how do we know, right??Something of an wildcard here. According to one of the Wallace calculators, it will be optimized with a 3.91 gear in place of the 4.30’s. That’s based on 3900 pounds at the line, 29 inch tire, and a trap rpm of 4500 while making 325 hp. And, at the risk of stirring the pot again… here’s the result of said calculator.
1/4 Mile ET: 12.72 seconds 1/4 Mile Speed: 100.55 MPH : 161.82 KPH Ideal Gear Ratio: 3.86
I myself think those numbers are wildly optimistic, but it’s going to be fun finding out!
You still got time, chubby.It doesn't always play out that way, so who knows. It will be about 3900 lbs at the start line is my guess.
Which brings us full circle to the definition of FUN!But hey, how do we know, right??
Absolutely!Which brings us full circle to the definition of FUN!
I been thinking about this.... and on paper seems to carry some weight. Wouldn't it be something if it were the winner? And when you think about it, would any be surprised regardless of what side of the spectrum they were on ...??FWIW, on the 36 entries here so far, we've got an average of 14.702.
I been thinking about this.... and on paper seems to carry some weight. Wouldn't it be something if it were the winner? And when you think about it, would any be surprised regardless of what side of the spectrum they were on ...??

Happy? Na, I don’t want it to be slow. I just know it will be. I’ll cheer the loudest for it to be fast. But I am painfully truthful in most situations. Most people don’t like that.Some of us are definitely on the spectrum
My guess is right at the group average so I’m feeling pretty good. If it goes faster I’ll be happy for you. If it goes slower @TT5.9mag will be happy
The reason I was curious and added it up when you mentioned the spread from slowest to fastest. I thought the average of all the guesses (including the outliers) would probably have as strong as of a probability of being correct as the others. And there's something that directly impacts my reasoning for that. Having been around a '76 440 HP and a '72 forged crank re-cammed 350hp 440 with stock four barrel intake and 750 carburetor, these engines have a lot of reciprocating mass in stock form and just won't rev as quickly as the low deck engines I've messed around with. There has been some test results mentioned by Herb McCandless where they've kept everything the same in a 440 and switched to lighter pistons with aluminum rods and a rebalance and went quicker than before, but I don't remember the exact numbers. So, there's that, too.I been thinking about this.... and on paper seems to carry some weight. Wouldn't it be something if it were the winner? And when you think about it, would any be surprised regardless of what side of the spectrum they were on ...??
But not too fast .... as you is willingly selling magnum stuff for RV stuff if it goes too fast.... ??? LOLHappy? Na, I don’t want it to be slow. I just know it will be. I’ll cheer the loudest for it to be fast. But I am painfully truthful in most situations. Most people don’t like that.
Yea I am, but let’s be honest, there’s no chance of this thing running 13.0x.But not too fast .... as you is willingly selling magnum stuff for RV stuff if it goes too fast.... ??? LOL
I think that's probably a stretch with the stock broomstick, too. I'm really curious how it responds to the addition of camshaft and carburetor, though. I really like the thought of trying one of these in it with the other present modifications in place.Yea I am, but let’s be honest, there’s no chance of this thing running 13.0x.
I'm with you 98.5%. I leave that 1.5% open because I've been surprised before.... including my 200,000 mile 5.9 going 12.9'sYea I am, but let’s be honest, there’s no chance of this thing running 13.0x.
If I was in the market for a camshaft, I'd slurp that upI think that's probably a stretch with the stock broomstick, too. I'm really curious how it responds to the addition of camshaft and carburetor, though. I really like the thought of trying one of these in it with the other present modifications in place.
[FOR SALE] - BB Camshaft and lifters MP -DC
I sure hope that poor truck doesn’t get the hammer treatment.And by the way, I'm not joking one bit. If this goes 16.9's or slower (on a good pass, that's all she has in her), I will allow my wife to smack it with a sludge hammer and I will video it and post it.
Not the truck, the RV440 LOL.I sure hope that poor truck doesn’t get the hammer treatment.
No way is it going to be that slow unless something is serious wrong with the engine.
Dan
It's time to hang it up.If this goes 16.9's or slower (
So let me say why I'm so confident this won't get the hammer. Let me share some of my past experiences taking trucks/vans to the track, though none was an RV 440.Not the truck, the RV440 LOL.
Let me say this: I have more confidence in it running a 13.0 than I do a 16.9. I don't think it's going to run either. The only thing I know of the engine as to how it runs was when I put it in the Magnum. It idled well, and revved fine, but I couldn't do any testing because the transmission was bad.
I can't say for sure, but around 2600 ish. I should have looked at the track when it was full hook'n up, but I didn't think of it or cared at that time... lolWhat did the convertor flash to behind the 360 again? Cant recall if that’s been covered