Not sure I would use this motor as an example of a G3 not making the torque of an LA. MDS/VVT cam that isn't being VVT'ed, short runner single plane intake, and a cam that while it might sounds small on the dyno isn't really (based on my limited info). It is only slightly smaller than the 380HP crate motor cam as what I've seen for the 6.4/6M cam is 286/288 adv, 215/
221@0.050 while the 380HP crate cam was 288/292, no idea what it was at 0.050, and the 6.4 cam has way more lift.
I've seen 5.7 dyno curves where the 6.4 cam loses zero low end power but gains in the upper range when VVT is used. I've also heard the cam was a dog without the VVT when it was first tried in the 5.7, to the extent of maybe 30hp loss over the 5.7 cam? Makes me wonder if this application would have gained a bunch more with VVT.
Not saying the G3 should be a torque monster, or arguing with the opinions posted. Just saying this seems like a bad one to use as the poster child of low torque output.
That said, if it was me, I would run the snot out of that motor as it sits. Who cares if some unknown keyboard wizard (me) thinks it might have more potential, looks like it has enough to be fun. And it might
not be down power, so who cares. I like it.
Now get it in the truck!