340 Steel Crank

-
If you're going to use crankshaft at least get it magnafluxed before you pay for it. You're talking about a 60-year-old piece that's been put through hell and back. There's just as many with cracks in them as not. Yes factory crankshafts both cast and forged were good pieces but to compare one to a modern 4340 forged Scat ,Eagle K4 Modular they're different leagues and you pay for it. I understand be true to your school and all but let's be Real.
 
Thank you to all , now while I have people's attention , any suggestions on .060 over pistons? I'm looking for a very high performance build. Aluminum heads. street strip style car. maybe 11.5/1 ? Also , would the factory rods that came out of my 1971 date coded 340 work for what I need?
factory rods will work if properly prepped.

but the cost to do so may be prohibitive in that you can buy new rods that are very strong for about the same or less than having the old ones worked over.
 
I agree but I still use factory rods. Those are tough heavy duty pieces. My machinist still asked me why I won't buy new rods. I tell him because these things are heavy duty. He laughs and agrees. But he does say they are heavy as hell. Just like 340 Pistons. Balancing the assembly is going to cost you more anyway.
 
If you're going to use crankshaft at least get it magnafluxed before you pay for it. You're talking about a 60-year-old piece that's been put through hell and back. There's just as many with cracks in them as not. Yes factory crankshafts both cast and forged were good pieces but to compare one to a modern 4340 forged Scat ,Eagle K4 Modular they're different leagues and you pay for it. I understand be true to your school and all but let's be Real.
I am bein real. A stock Chrysler casting or forging is still superior to any of the brands you mentioned, IMO. They're still made with chinkesium metallurgy. But I agree 100% with having them magnafluxed.
 
Yes, but the finish product is supposed to be better "somehow". Tom has mentioned it before. Maybe we can get him to expound on it again.
Probably like the Chinese made Speedmaster heads. Not bad stuff.
 
Yes, but the finish product is supposed to be better "somehow". Tom has mentioned it before. Maybe we can get him to expound on it again.
It sounds like the OP found a factory crank. If it checks out it should be plenty fine for what he is building.
 
I definitely agree with Mopar Sam! Unless it's. 040 now, I sure wouldn't bore it any more than necessary. The extra 3 or 4 cubic inches are meaningless, the stiffest cylinder walls are WAY more important.
Standard now? Bore it .020 . .030 now? Bore it .040
If it NEEDS to be .060? I'd spring for the lightest custom pistons I could find with the c.r. I want. Any of the custom piston makers can give you what you want.
For a shelf piston? I'd look at Icon.
As for the factory rods. They should be fine, if you're willing to do what it takes......magnaflux for cracks, really great bolts, precision resize, beam polish, and balance.
I have come to the conclusion that I would go aftermarket 4340 H-beams first. Lighter, stronger, Zero cycles vs how many hundred thousand?
 
Last edited:
Who has the lightest steel rods? How about a forged 273 crank with some lightweight pistons. All close enough to balance with adding mallory metal.
 
I definitely agree with Mopar Sam! Unless it's. 040 now, I sure wouldn't bore it any more than necessary. The extra 3 or 4 cubic inches are meaningless, the stiffest cylinder walls are WAY more important.
Standard now? Bore it .020 . .030 now? Bore it .040
If it NEEDS to be .060? I'd spring for the lightest custom pistons I could find with the c.r. I want. Any of the custom piston makers can give you what you want.
For a shelf piston? I'd look at Icon.
As for the factory rods. They should be fine, if you're willing to do what it takes......magnaflux for cracks, really great bolts, precision resize, beam polish, and balance.
I have come to the conclusion that I would go aftermarket 4340 H-beams first. Lighter, stronger, Zero cycles vs how many hundred thousand?
I'm looking at Keith Black Hypereutectic pistons. Anyone know if these are a good option? Street driven looking for a 10.5/1 street/strip kind of build. Part # KB243-.060. Also Aluminum heads, aftermarket rods if they are reasonable.
 
aftermarket rods if they are reasonable.

The scat i beam rods..

 
I'm looking at Keith Black Hypereutectic pistons. Anyone know if these are a good option? Street driven looking for a 10.5/1 street/strip kind of build. Part # KB243-.060. Also Aluminum heads, aftermarket rods if they are reasonable.
If you ever might consider nitrous, I wouldn't use hyper pistons, but that's just me. I haven't built a non-forged piston motor in twenty or thirty years.
 
If you ever might consider nitrous, I wouldn't use hyper pistons, but that's just me. I haven't built a non-forged piston motor in twenty or thirty years.
Nitrous would never be an option But Just asking because I have a chance to buy these pistons cheap but was just taking a chance. Unfortunately they aren't getting the reviews I was looking for.
 
You haven't mentioned the current bore of your block, at least not that I've seen.
I sure wouldn't bore a standard or .030 block to .060, JUST to use some cheap pistons, hyper, forged or otherwise.
 
You haven't mentioned the current bore of your block, at least not that I've seen.
I sure wouldn't bore a standard or .030 block to .060, JUST to use some cheap pistons, hyper, forged or otherwise.
I stated its a .060 over bore
 
I'm looking at Keith Black Hypereutectic pistons. Anyone know if these are a good option? Street driven looking for a 10.5/1 street/strip kind of build. Part # KB243-.060. Also Aluminum heads, aftermarket rods if they are reasonable.
If you run them, I would use the nitrous spec for ring gap.....even if you build naturally aspirated. Just my opinion.
 
If it's already .060, no reason not to run the hypers if your not gonna squeeze it. But as RRR says, run plenty of ring gap!
Most of the busted hypers are from people not reading the instructions, running a normal end gap, and the ringlands busting.
 
I've decided to go the 340 route and am going to go with new aftermarket rods , pistons etc. I'm just curious if anyone currently makes a new standard Steel 3.31" stroke 340 crank or am I just going to have to use the factory steel one? I've been looking but came up empty every time. Thank you
Early 273 cranks were forged. They're out there.
 

So with everything being said , Stock 340 steel crank , .060 over , Going to have Eddys for heads , Victor intake , 750 QF carb , what do you guys suggest piston/rods setup for my application? I want a very strong bottom end that's not afraid to rev.
 
-
Back
Top Bottom