KB Dome Pistons in 383. Do you like them?

-
The combo will have to produce enough HP to cross the stripe at 7000 RPM with a 26" tire for 125 MPH. about 10.9 et
 
You might take a look at the Icon 687, it's a tad lighter and forged. It will yield about 10.4 compression with a 80cc Stealth chamber.
125 mph is going to take a SERIOUS camshaft, RPM and head flow with a 383.
I also like the ring thickness.
The combo will have to produce enough HP to cross the stripe at 7000 RPM with a 26" tire for 125 MPH. about 10.9 et
Perfect for 4.30s in the rear. I still don't see why you think 383 cubes with 270+ cfm peak heads with good mid lift numbers would have any problem producing enough power for a 2900# car to run 125mph in the 1/4, it could do better if I wasn't talking a daily driver. Not being a jerk I just don't understand if I'm missing something
 
Here they are at CNC motorsports, BB Chrysler 383 Icon Forged Pistons Dome 4.5cc 4.310 Bore IC687-060 but shop around, of course. With the 74 CC chambers and FelPro 1009 head gasket at zero deck you'll have 11.05:1. But, being a forged piston will require extra bore clearance and have a little more piston rock at TDC a thicker gasket for a safety margin isn't a bad idea. The still yet appallingly expensive TFS Cometic head gaskets with a 4.38 inch bore and and .051 compressed thickness will give you a slightly lower compression ratio of 10.7:1. But, if your having a custom cam ground, you get it set up to bleed enough cylinder pressure at low rpm to be docile enough to putt around on 93 octane, and once to the track top off with race gas. Putting a timing retard control in the vehicle makes this a lot easier to get by with.
 
Here they are at CNC motorsports, BB Chrysler 383 Icon Forged Pistons Dome 4.5cc 4.310 Bore IC687-060 but shop around, of course. With the 74 CC chambers and FelPro 1009 head gasket at zero deck you'll have 11.05:1. But, being a forged piston will require extra bore clearance and have a little more piston rock at TDC a thicker gasket for a safety margin isn't a bad idea. The still yet appallingly expensive TFS Cometic head gaskets with a 4.38 inch bore and and .051 compressed thickness will give you a slightly lower compression ratio of 10.7:1. But, if your having a custom cam ground, you get it set up to bleed enough cylinder pressure at low rpm to be docile enough to putt around on 93 octane, and once to the track top off with race gas. Putting a timing retard control in the vehicle makes this a lot easier to get by with.
Thank you very much for the link. I may go with a .051 gasket just to stay a LITTLE safer. I can always Pull the heads and throw a .039 in it if I decide to run Ethanol later down the line. I think I will be running the Icons. They are better all around for the goal on the engine.
 

Decent specs. Not a bad ballpark. A lot of things a real cam guy like Ed Curtis could do to make a cam magic but appear bland at face value. I'm not all knowing when it comes to cams I'm just ok at best. So I'd say that's a relative ballpark. I'd like to see more lift but like I said I'm just ok.
 
I wouldn't run lesss than 11:1 because there is no reason not to if you are getting a custom grind.
 
Last edited:
I know that the OP stated he's going to run a flat tappet, but I've been wondering lately what it would take to convert the old MP 590 specs to a roller.
Call up a cam company, tell them your idea. However, they could duplicate that cam or turn up the cam via a more aggressive lobe. It should t be a problem. Though I’m sure they have there own competitive version.

There was an excellent camshaft shoot out article staring a pair of MP cams. One being the .590, the other, the .557 lift mechanical cam. They faired very very well even though there ramps, max lifts, etc... on all the cam stuff, isn’t a full balls out race unit unlike some of the other cams tested.
 
Call up a cam company, tell them your idea. However, they could duplicate that cam or turn up the cam via a more aggressive lobe. It should t be a problem. Though I’m sure they have there own competitive version.

There was an excellent camshaft shoot out article staring a pair of MP cams. One being the .590, the other, the .557 lift mechanical cam. They faired very very well even though there ramps, max lifts, etc... on all the cam stuff, isn’t a full balls out race unit unlike some of the other cams tested.
Link to shootout? Solid flat on a Mopar lifter allows a pretty bad *** profile for a flat tappet. Mopar and AMC (I have a 69 AMX as well.) got with the program for lifter diameter.
 
It’s not all about max power but power under the curve. This is a 5 or 6 small block cam shoot out. The 2 MP cams are the .557 lift and the .590 lift cams vs others of comparable size or what that manufacturer suggested as a better cam to best the MP. In which, there specs were something a good bit larger.

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/mopar-performance-purple-shaft-camshaft/
 
It’s not all about max power but power under the curve. This is a 5 or 6 small block cam shoot out. The 2 MP cams are the .557 lift and the .590 lift cams vs others of comparable size or what that manufacturer suggested as a better cam to best the MP. In which, there specs were something a good bit larger.
https://www.hotrod.com/articles/mopar-performance-purple-shaft-camshaft/
Mopar Performance Purple Shaft Camshaft - Mopar Muscle Magazine - Hot Rod
Thank you for the link.
 
-
Back
Top Bottom