I can look at this from both sides, as a pee-wee player and a parent. I'm 54 now but I still remember playing hockey when I was kid. I wouldn't let my parents stay for my games, especially my mother. I played hockey for the fun. Don't get me wrong, I was very competitive and wanted to win more than most kids, but it wasn't the end of the world if we didn't win. I progressed through the minor hockey program and was playing Junior "A" when I was still midget age. At that point, I gave up the competitive side of hockey because of a few things I saw with my own eyes. One was a mother of one of the players level a referee with her purse because she thought her son was in the penalty box to much. He should have been there more than he was. The other was a father absolutely going nuts on his son because of his poor play in a game I played in. I went back to playing house league after that and had a ton of fun.
As a parent I always told my son, you play to have fun, you play to win but I don't ever want to see you do cheap crap on the ice. If your gong to fight, fight, but it better be to protect one of your teammates or yourself. I don't ever want to see you rubbing your glove in somebody's face.
There are some things to remember with any sport.
1. If you don't want it to be competitive, don't keep score.
2. If it is competitive, not everybody is going to be happy.
3. If it is competitive, not everybody gets a medal or trophy.
4. If you don't declare a winner at the end of a season, it's not a sport.
As far as this idiot in the article is concerned, his occupation should tell you a lot.
This will sound sexist but it's not meant to be. Girls have girls teams and boys have boys teams and that's where everybody should stay. It would make life a lot easier for everybody. I wonder if the little girls mother ever thought of that when she pushed to have her daughter play on the boys team. There are lots of parents that want to live their lives through their kids accomplishments in the sports venues.
rant off
Jack